authorityresearch.com

"Can" makes "Is" subject to "Ought," negating "Is":
"Consensus" makes "Discussion" subject to "Dialogue," negating "Discussion."
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

'Justifying' your "self," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interest" before others (dialoguing your opinion , i.e., "I feel ..." "I think ..." to a consensus with others) makes "right and wrong" subjective, i.e., subject to your opinion, i.e., subject to your "feelings" of the 'moment' (which are being stimulated by the world, i.e., by the situation—which includes your desire for the approval of men as well as your fear of being rejected by men) making "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which is "Only" of "the world" "right" and the father's/Father's authority (that gets in the way of "lust," i.e., "self interest") "wrong." Dialogue "filters" the father's/Father's authority out of a so called "discussion," negating the father's/Father's authority in the outcome—only that information that is relevant ("appropriate") to the desires outcome, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self" is affirmed (approved, i.e., 'justified') in dialogue. "Appropriate information" is any information (any opinion) that guarantees the desires outcome, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life." "Inappropriate information" is any information (any established command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience that the father's/father's authority engenders) that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks the desires outcome. 'Change,' i.e., satisfying "lust," which is ever 'changing' according to the 'changing' situations (temptations) of life is guaranteed via dialogue. 'Change' is prevented, i.e., inhibited or blocked via. discussion (unless it is based upon information, i.e., "appropriate information" arrived as through dialogue first, making it so called "discussion," i.e., discussion in name only—"discussion" seeking consensus negates the father's/Father's authority in the outcome). Being "positive" and not "negative" is dialogue disguised as discussion, seducing, deceiving, and manipulating you into participation (out of your desire for the approval of men, affirming your and their carnal nature, i.e., desires, i.e., "lusts"), negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., any established command, rule, fact, or truth (true discussion) that gets in the way of the desired outcome, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16, 17

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words: "Lust 'reconciles' you to the world," negating your need to be 'reconciled' to the Father. "Ought" 'reconciles' you to "Is," making "Ought" "Is" and "Is" "Ought," (making "self," i.e., "lust" and the world that stimulates it all there "Is," i.e., all that counts) negating "Is" (the father's/Father's authority). It is all in how you define "Is."

"Is" is how the world "is," i.e., subject to the father's/Father's authority. "Ought" is how the world "ought" to be (according to the carnally minded child), i.e., subject to the child's carnal nature, i.e., subject to the child's "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation). "Can" is how the world "can" be, once the father's/Father's authority is negated—allowing the child to do what he wants, when he wants, i.e., do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders).

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

By children 'justifying' their "self" before one another (as is being done in the "contemporary" classroom), i.e., dialoguing (sharing) their opinions (their "ought's") with one another to a consensus (affirmation), i.e., to a "feeling" of "oneness" with one another, making their "feelings," i.e., their "ought" (their "self interest") of the 'moment' (which the world stimulates) the standard for right and wrong (with pleasure, i.e. "ought" being right and restraint, i.e., "Is," i.e., missing out on pleasure being wrong) they are able to negate the father's/Father's authority in their thoughts and in their actions, negating the guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) in the process, so they "Can" (questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking the father's/Father's authority) become their "self," i.e., only "of the world." Dialogue 'reconciles' the child to the world. The child's "Why?" in response to the father's/Father's command or rule is the child's effort to draw the father into dialogue so he can be 'reconciled' to the world—instead of having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, in faith and obedience being 'reconciled' to the father/Father.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

If we make the children's classroom experience subject to the father's/Father's authority system (chart), 1) preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as "Is," i.e., by faith, discussing any command, rule, fact, or truth the children do not understand, at the father's/Father's discretion, providing he deems it necessary, has time, those under authority are able of to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his authority, 2) blessing and/or rewarding those who do right and obey, 3) correcting and/or chastening those who do wrong and/or disobey, and 4) casting out or expelling any who question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack his authority, the father's/Father's authority (and the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e. "lusting") is retained in society. But if we, through the dialoguing of their opinions to a consensus, make the children's classroom experience subject to their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world ("the group") stimulates, then the father's/Father's authority is negated in not only their thoughts but in their actions as well, 'liberating' society from the father's/Father's authority as a consequence..

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child, ... the surplus is not the property of one of them ... all contracts regarding property or service and the like fall away ... the surplus, labour, and property are absolutely common to all, inherently and explicitly." ibid. If the child's carnal nature, which all men, women and children have in common is the basis of society, then the father's/Father's authority, i.e., private property and business is negated becoming the property of all.

The "consensus" process makes the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "Is" subject to the child's carnal nature, i.e., to "Ought," negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "Is" and the guilty conscience that the father's/Father's authority engenders (for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting") so children can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust," i.e., do what they want, when they want with impunity, i.e., without having a guilty conscience. The consensus process, i.e., 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "Ought" before others "filters" out the father's/Father's authority, i.e., what "Is" in making decisions.

"We have to study the conditions which maximize ought-perceptiveness." "Oughtiness is itself a fact to be perceived." "If we wish to permit the facts to tell us their oughtiness, we must learn to listen to them in a very specific way which can be called Taoistic [non-judgmental]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)

There is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., no "Can not," "Must not," "Thou shalt not," "It is written," "Because I said so," i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., 'limits' and 'measures' in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process (as there is in a discussion), there is only the child's carnal desires ("self interest") of the 'moment, which the world stimulates. Instead of children having to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self," i.e., having to miss out on the carnal pleasures ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates (in order to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., obey the father's/Father's established commands and rules as given and accept his/His facts and truth as "Is," i.e., by faith), children, in the consensus process are able to make discussion (right and wrong, i.e., "Is") subject to dialogue (to their "feelings," i.e., to their carnal desires, i.e., to their "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., to their "Ought") negating the "Is," i.e., the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting"), 'creating' a "new" world order where "Ought" ("oughtiness," i.e., their carnal nature, i.e., "feelings," i.e., "human nature") is the world that "Is," so they "Can" do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust) with impunity—making anything they imagine possible. This is the pathway of the so called "new" world order, that leads to death.

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020